Auto lending is one of the DOJ’s most active SCRA enforcement targets. Four lenders have paid a combined $11 million or more in settlements for illegal vehicle repossessions since 2015, and the pace is accelerating.
Santander Consumer USA. Westlake Financial. Hyundai Capital America. CarMax. Each case follows the same pattern: a servicemember’s vehicle is repossessed without the court order that the SCRA requires, a complaint reaches the DOJ, and a multimillion-dollar investigation follows.
If your organization originates, services, or collects on auto loans, SCRA compliance is not a side concern. It is a core operational requirement that the DOJ is actively enforcing.
The Enforcement Record
Santander Consumer USA: $9.35 Million (2015)
The largest SCRA auto repossession settlement in history began with a single complaint. An Army Specialist’s car was repossessed while he was at basic training. The DOJ investigation that followed found that Santander had illegally repossessed 1,112 vehicles from servicemembers, 760 without the required court orders.
Santander was required to pay at least $9.35 million in compensation, develop SCRA-compliant policies and submit them to the DOJ for approval, implement DMDC verification before all repossessions, train all relevant staff, and operate under a five-year consent order with court-retained jurisdiction.
Westlake Financial: $760,000 (2017) and $225,000 (2022)
Westlake illegally repossessed 70 vehicles from servicemembers without court orders, targeting junior enlisted servicemembers. The 2017 consent decree required DMDC verification, policy changes, and training.
Then the DOJ found that Westlake was violating the consent decree itself. During monitoring, the DOJ discovered that Westlake failed to apply the 6% interest rate cap retroactively to the date military orders were issued, a basic SCRA requirement. The result was an additional $225,000 settlement in 2022. Being under a consent decree does not mean compliance is solved. It means the DOJ is watching.
Hyundai Capital America: $333,941 (2024)
The DOJ alleged that Hyundai illegally repossessed 26 vehicles from SCRA-protected servicemembers between 2015 and 2023. In one case, Navy Airman Jessica Johnson had previously faxed Hyundai her enlistment orders in 2015. Two years later, she called a customer service agent on July 27, 2017, and explicitly confirmed she was still in the military. Hyundai repossessed her car three days after that call.
Under the consent order, Hyundai was required to pay $10,000 plus lost equity to each affected servicemember, pay a $74,941 civil penalty, repair all servicemembers’ credit, implement SCRA training, and develop SCRA-compliant policies and procedures.
CarMax: ~$500,000 (2026)
The most recent case. CarMax illegally repossessed 28 vehicles from servicemembers between 2018 and 2023, including activated reservists whose protections were missed. Each affected servicemember receives $15,000 plus lost equity. CarMax must pay a $79,380 civil penalty, delete all negative credit reporting for affected accounts, integrate DMDC verification into its repossession workflow, and operate under a four-year consent decree.
Why Auto Lending Is a DOJ Priority
Three factors make auto lending a high-risk area for SCRA enforcement.
Repossession is the sharpest adverse action. When a servicemember’s car is repossessed while they are deployed or at training, they lose transportation, credit standing, and any equity in the vehicle, often with no immediate recourse. The human impact is severe and visible, which makes it a priority for DOJ enforcement.
The court order requirement is absolute. Section 3952 of the SCRA prohibits repossession of personal property (including vehicles) without a court order when the contract was entered before active duty and the servicemember made at least one payment before entering service. There is no exception for delinquency, no cure period that overrides it, and no self-help remedy. A lender that repossesses without a court order has violated federal law, period.
Compliance gaps are widespread. The CFPB found that fewer than 10% of eligible auto loans held by activated Guard and Reserve members received the legally required SCRA interest rate reduction. If that gap exists for rate caps (a relatively straightforward compliance obligation), the gaps in repossession procedures are likely worse.
What the SCRA Requires of Auto Lenders
Court Order Before Repossession (Section 3952)
A creditor may not repossess personal property (including vehicles) owned by a servicemember on active duty without first obtaining a court order. This applies when the vehicle loan or lease was entered before the borrower’s active-duty service began and the borrower made at least one payment before military service.
This is the provision that Santander, Westlake, Hyundai, and CarMax all violated. It is the single most common source of SCRA enforcement in auto lending.
6% Interest Rate Cap (Section 3937)
For loans originated before active-duty service, the interest rate must be reduced to 6% for the duration of military service. The lender must forgive (not defer) the interest above 6%. The reduction is retroactive to the date of the military orders, not the date the servicemember requests it.
Westlake’s 2022 violation was specifically about failing to apply the rate cap retroactively. The DOJ does not accept prospective-only rate reductions.
Default Judgment Protections (Section 3931)
Before obtaining a default judgment against any defendant, the plaintiff must file an affidavit with the court stating whether the defendant is in military service, and if unable to determine status, stating so. Filing a deficient military status affidavit is the violation that cost PRG Real Estate $1.59 million in the property management context. For auto lenders pursuing deficiency balances through courts after repossession, this requirement applies.
Stay of Proceedings (Section 3932)
A servicemember who receives notice of a court proceeding and cannot appear due to military service can request a stay of at least 90 days. The court must grant the stay if the servicemember’s ability to appear is materially affected by military service.
Where Violations Happen
Based on the enforcement cases, auto lending SCRA violations cluster in three operational areas.
Collections workflows that skip military status checks. The most common failure. An account becomes delinquent, the collections process initiates, and no one checks whether the borrower is on active duty before ordering a repossession. This is exactly what happened at Santander (1,112 times), Westlake (70 times), Hyundai (26 times), and CarMax (28 times).
Reservist and Guard status changes missed. CarMax’s violations included activated reservists whose protections were not identified. A borrower who was civilian at loan origination may activate at any point during the loan term. Without ongoing monitoring, the transition goes undetected until a repossession triggers a complaint.
Rate cap processing failures. Even when servicemembers self-identify and provide military orders, the interest rate reduction may not be applied correctly. Westlake failed to apply the rate cap retroactively, a specific requirement that many loan servicing systems do not handle automatically.
What a Compliant Auto Lending Operation Looks Like
Based on the compliance requirements embedded in every recent consent decree:
Verify military status before every repossession. Check the DMDC database for every borrower before initiating any repossession action. Not a sample. Not on request. Every account, every time. This is what every consent decree requires, and it is the minimum the DOJ will accept going forward.
Build verification into the workflow, not around it. The verification step must be embedded in your collections and repossession processes so that no repossession can proceed without a documented DMDC check. Manual processes that rely on staff remembering to check are what failed at Santander, Westlake, Hyundai, and CarMax.
Monitor portfolios continuously. Reservists and Guard members can activate at any time. A single DMDC check at origination is not sufficient. Ongoing monitoring (monthly or more frequent) catches status changes before they result in violations.
Process rate cap requests correctly. When a servicemember provides military orders and requests the 6% rate cap, apply the reduction retroactively to the date of the orders, forgive (not defer) the excess interest, and re-amortize the loan accordingly. Document every step.
Train collections and servicing staff. Every consent decree mandates training. Staff who handle delinquent accounts, initiate repossessions, or process SCRA requests must know what the SCRA requires, how to verify military status, and what to do when status is confirmed.
Maintain complete records. Document every DMDC verification, every rate cap application, every decision not to proceed with an adverse action, and every servicemember interaction. When the DOJ requests records (and in every case above, they did), you need to produce them.
The Math
Civil penalties per SCRA violation are $79,380 for a first offense and $158,761 for subsequent offenses, per the July 2025 inflation adjustment. These are per-violation amounts.
CarMax repossessed 28 vehicles. At the current first-offense penalty rate, theoretical maximum civil penalty exposure for those 28 violations alone exceeds $2.2 million, before compensation, credit repair, legal fees, and the operational cost of a four-year consent decree.
Santander’s 1,112 illegal repossessions occurred over a period when penalties were lower than today’s rates. At current rates, the civil penalty exposure for that volume of violations would be staggering.
A single illegal repossession of one servicemember’s vehicle creates more regulatory exposure than the annual cost of automating SCRA compliance for your entire portfolio.
One Complaint Is Enough
Santander’s investigation started with one Army Specialist. Hyundai’s started with Navy Airman Jessica Johnson. One servicemember, one complaint to the DOJ, one investigation that uncovers years of violations across thousands of accounts.
Servicemember complaints hit 84,600 in 2023, up 98% from 2021. The DOJ Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative has dedicated enforcement resources. The SCRA Enforcement Support Pilot Program has placed Assistant U.S. Attorneys in districts with large military populations.
The enforcement infrastructure is in place. The question for auto lenders is whether their compliance infrastructure matches it. See the complete SCRA Enforcement Actions Database for every settlement since 2011.
civrel.io automates SCRA compliance for auto lenders: DMDC verification integrated into collections and repossession workflows, continuous portfolio monitoring for military status changes, automated rate cap calculations with retroactive application, and audit-ready documentation for every action.
Santander repossessed 760 military vehicles illegally. The settlement: $9.35 million. What does your pre-repo verification process look like?
Check Your Exposure → · See Pricing →
Related training
See these topics covered in depth in our free SCRA training videos. Watch now →
Ready to automate your SCRA compliance?
See how civrel.io replaces manual processes with continuous, automated monitoring.